The hopper boats Sloeber and Pagadder have to moor alongside the dredger as depicted. The giant dredger picks up 5 tons from the seabed each gulp. It's not safe in today's high winds, so all the boats stayed in Barry Dock this morning.
https://penarthnews.wordpress.com/2018/09/18/storm-helene-steps-in-to-stop-nuclear-mud-dumping-off-penarth/ |
The two licenses issued by the English Marine Management Organisation (MMO) are
L/2012/00245 This does not licence the disposal of the dredgings but says: 3.2.1 Materials arising from the capital dredge of the berthing pocket of the jetty shall be deposited at Cardiff Grounds.
L/2013/00178 All dredgings, predicted up to 200 000m3 are to be disposed in Severn Estuary SAC under Condition 5.2.24: Reason: to maintain the sediment budget of the area.
The second license description says only: It is proposed that the dredged material
will be disposed of at the Cardiff Grounds licensed disposal site and consent
for this aspect will be requested from the Welsh Government
It also allows for "drilling arisings" which are to be disposed of in defined sites in the cleared area, to be deposited carefully by pipe, to minimise the pollution plume (total under 1200m3 ).
The tunnels for the pipes to the shore are to be bored from on-shore. The "arisings" from the total 9.5 km tunnels will be disposed of on-site or to landfill. The dredgings could similarly go on-site for landscaping bunds or infill. Why not?
a) it's physically simpler and cheaper to dump in the estuaryb) they fear finding nuclear matter within the dredgings (unlike the tunnel borings in very old deposits).They would have to test more carefully for reusing the dredgings on land (only 5 samples taken from depth in the 200 000m3 ), would have to isolate significant nuclear contaminants, and dispose of them at high cost. Simpler to dump in our sea.
No comments:
Post a Comment